The first two years of war saw conflict in the North Sea limited to skirmishes by battlecruisers at the Battle of Heligoland Bight and Battle of Dogger Bank, and raids on the English coast. In May 1916, a further attempt to draw British ships into battle on favourable terms resulted in a clash of the battlefleets on 31 May to 1 June in the indecisive Battle of Jutland. [132] SMS Szent István begins to roll over after being torpedoed in 1918 The design process for these ships often included discussion of an 'all-big-gun one-calibre' alternative. [16] [d] The June 1902 issue of Proceedings of the US Naval Institute contained comments by the US Navy's leading gunnery expert, P. R. Alger, proposing a main battery of eight 12-inch (305mm) guns in twin turrets. [17] In May 1902, the Bureau of Construction and Repair submitted a design for the battleship with twelve 10-inch (254mm) guns in twin turrets, two at the ends and four in the wings. [17] Lt. Cdr. Homer C. Poundstone submitted a paper to President Theodore Roosevelt in December 1902 arguing the case for larger battleships. In an appendix to his paper, Poundstone suggested a greater number of 11-and-9-inch (279 and 229mm) guns was preferable to a smaller number of 12-and-9-inch (305 and 229mm). [2] The Naval War College and Bureau of Construction and Repair developed these ideas in studies between 1903 and 1905. War-game studies begun in July 1903 "showed that a battleship armed with twelve 11-or-12-inch (279 or 305mm) guns hexagonally arranged would be equal to three or more of the conventional type." [18] Corbett, Sir Julian (1994). Maritime Operations In The Russo-Japanese War 1904–1905. Naval Institute Press. ISBN 978-1-55750-129-5. Originally Classified and in two volumes. If all turrets were on the centreline of the vessel, stresses on the ship's frames were relatively low. This layout meant the entire main battery could fire on the broadside, though fewer could fire end-on. It meant the hull would be longer, which posed some challenges for the designers; a longer ship needed to devote more weight to armour to get equivalent protection, and the magazines which served each turret interfered with the distribution of boilers and engines. [42] For these reasons, HMS Agincourt, which carried a record fourteen 12-inch guns in seven centreline turrets, was not considered a success. [43] That’s why you need this printable battleship game at the ready! Laminate the Battleship Paper Printable to Create a Reusable Game

Gröner, Erich (1990). German Warships: 1815–1945. Vol.I: Major Surface Vessels. Annapolis: Naval Institute Press. ISBN 978-0-87021-790-6. As parents, we all know how dangerous and distracting that can be when your are driving. Having this battleship game on paper printable ready to go in these very situations will help keep the peace and avoid many stressful situations.

Marder, Arthur J. (1964). The Anatomy of British Sea Power: A History of British Naval Policy in the Pre-Dreadnought Era, 1880–1905. Frank Cass & Co. All-big-gun designs commenced almost simultaneously in three navies. In 1904, the Imperial Japanese Navy authorized construction of Satsuma, originally designed with twelve 12-inch (305mm) guns. Work began on her construction in May 1905. [3] [4] The Royal Navy began the design of HMS Dreadnought in January 1905, and she was laid down in October of the same year. [5] Finally, the US Navy gained authorization for USS Michigan, carrying eight 12-inch guns, in March 1905, [5] with construction commencing in December 1906. [6] Oil-fired propulsion had many advantages for naval architects and officers at sea alike. It reduced smoke, making ships less visible. It could be fed into boilers automatically, rather than needing a complement of stokers to do it by hand. Oil has roughly twice the thermal content of coal. This meant that the boilers themselves could be smaller; and for the same volume of fuel, an oil-fired ship would have much greater range. [80] Turbines offered more power than reciprocating engines for the same volume of machinery. [73] [74] This, along with a guarantee on the new machinery from the inventor, Charles Parsons, persuaded the Royal Navy to use turbines in Dreadnought. [74] It is often said that turbines had the additional benefits of being cleaner and more reliable than reciprocating engines. [75] By 1905, new designs of reciprocating engine were available which were cleaner and more reliable than previous models. [73] Equally, you can just use it as a battleship paper game printable for the kids as and when you need it.

See also: World War I naval arms race and Causes of World War I King George V ( left) inspects HMS Neptune Over time the calibre of guns tended to increase. In the Royal Navy, the Orion class, launched 1910, had ten 13.5-inch guns, all on the centreline; the Queen Elizabeth class, launched in 1913, had eight 15-inch (381mm) guns. In all navies, fewer guns of larger calibre came to be used. The smaller number of guns simplified their distribution, and centreline turrets became the norm. [48]The Italian Regia Marina had received proposals for an all-big-gun battleship from Cuniberti well before Dreadnought was launched, but it took until 1909 for Italy to lay down one of its own. The construction of Dante Alighieri was prompted by rumours of Austro-Hungarian dreadnought-building. A further five dreadnoughts of the Conte di Cavour and Andrea Doria classes followed as Italy sought to maintain its lead over Austria-Hungary. These ships remained the core of Italian naval strength until World War II. The subsequent Francesco Caracciolo-class battleship were suspended (and later cancelled) on the outbreak of World War I. [109]